Cosmetics · R&D
R&D software for cosmetic manufacturers
Today
A formulation works in the lab, then fails at 500kg, and the trial history that would explain why is spread across notebooks, spreadsheets and one chemist's memory.
Generic project and lab tools record that a trial happened. They don't hold composition, use levels, restricted substance limits or the commercial constraints the formula has to satisfy, so feasibility is discovered late.
With Worldover
Worldover R&D connects trials, stability, compatibility and scale-up results to the formula version, the raw material specifications and the customer brief they belong to.
Development output is a specification production can run and regulatory can defend, rather than a formula that needs re-proving.
The problem
Why generic R&D failscosmetics manufacturer teams.
Trials are stored, not connected
An ELN or shared drive records the result. It can't tell you that the winning trial used a raw material grade you're no longer buying.
Cost and MOQ arrive after the science
Formulators optimise performance, then discover that the material has a 500kg minimum order and a nine-week lead time, so the work is redone.
Compliance is a review gate, not an input
Restricted substances, allergen declarations and market limits are checked at the end, when a change is expensive rather than free.
A working day
A Thursday in the lab
A customer asks for a sulphate-free variant of an existing cleanser at the same cost per unit.
Today: the formulator starts from a copied spreadsheet, chases procurement for prices, and asks regulatory whether the new surfactant is acceptable in three markets.
In Worldover: the existing formula is cloned as a new version with its cost, supplier and compliance context attached.
Candidate surfactants show their price bands, MOQs, lead times and market restrictions while the formulator is still choosing.
Stability and compatibility results attach to the trial, and the version that passes becomes the released specification without re-entry.
How it runs
How R&D worksinside Worldover.
01
Brief lands with its constraints
Target cost, pack, market and claim requirements are visible in the lab, not held in the commercial team's inbox.
02
Trials build on the product record
Every trial references composition, supplier grade and batch of raw material used, so results remain interpretable months later.
03
Stability and testing are tracked to completion
Protocols, pull points and results sit on the version, with outstanding tests visible before anyone promises a launch date.
04
Scale-up carries the evidence forward
Pilot and production trials link to the same version, so deviations at scale are diagnosed against known lab conditions.
What's in it
The detail behindR&D.
R&D Lab Software
Digital lab covering raw materials, formulations and regulatory screening.
Raw materials workflow management
Build a raw material library with custom workflows across multiple material types, document types and field types, all defined by you during onboarding.
Composition management
Add ingredients to raw materials as ranges or exact percentages, with full impurities management at ppm.
Table management
Customisable views by coding system, part number, type or cost.
Complex cost management
Manage raw material costs with customisable costing modules, currency settings and automatic currency conversion.
Gap analysis
Reports showing which documents are present against which are missing.
Raw material administration
Codes and sub-codes to organise the library the way your team already thinks.
The difference
Why the substance recordmakes the difference.
Formulation is substance work. Worldover stores INCI, function, supplier grade, purity, allergen content and regulatory status on the material itself, so a chemist sees the constraint at the moment of choosing rather than at the review meeting. Change a supplier grade and every trial that used it's flagged.
Better together
What changes when R&Dshares a record with the rest of your setup.
R&D + PLM
The winning trial becomes an approved formula version rather than a document handed over.
Explore PLMR&D + QMS
Specifications and test methods developed in the lab become the release criteria used on the line.
Explore QMSR&D + ERP
Costed formulas produce a real margin picture before the quote is sent.
Explore ERPWillow
What teams actually askonce the record is in one place.
- Which trials used this raw material grade, and what were their stability outcomes?
- Draft a comparison of the last three surfactant options we trialled, with cost per unit and market restrictions.
- What is outstanding on stability for the products we plan to release next month?
Willow doesn't replace expert judgment. It removes the searching, re-keying and chasing between the systems that hold your answers.
Request a demo
We'll walk through your current workflow, then show the same workflow running on one record.
Research
Compared with the alternatives
If you're still building a shortlist, these break the market down side by side.
- ShortlistBest cosmetic formulation software in 2026Formulation tools ranked on INCI, costing and regulatory checks.Read it
- ShortlistBest PLM software for beauty brands in 2026PLM options for beauty, and where each one stops short of regulation.Read it
- ComparisonWorldover vs SelerantFormulation and regulatory coverage side by side.Read it











